Opinion Occlusion: Difference between revisions

Line 10:

#: ''The unanimous vote was less a [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consensus '''consensus'''] than a product of '''opinion occlusion''', with several members privately [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dissenting '''dissenting'''].''

# (''epistemology, media studies'') The systemic sidelining of a viewpoint through agenda-setting, framing, or noise rather than direct censorship.

#: ''~~Minority scientific positions may undergo~~ '''opinion occlusion''' ~~not by editorial suppression but~~ by ~~sheer volume~~ of ~~contradictory coverage~~.''

#: ''Wikipedia's reliance on accepted sources for neutral point of view creates '''opinion occlusion''' by limiting the scope of permissible discourse to sources that appeal to its editors' left-libertarian sensibilities.''

# Any force, mechanism, or structure that blocks or suppresses an opinion or range of opinions from expression or consideration, particularly those originating from an opposing viewpoint or rival ideological tradition.

# (''rhetoric, informal'') Any mechanism, deliberate or structural, by which a genuine judgment is displaced in expression by a safer or more palatable substitute.

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 #: ''The unanimous vote was less a [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/consensus '''consensus'''] than a product of '''opinion occlusion''', with several members privately [https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dissenting '''dissenting'''].''
 # (''epistemology, media studies'') The systemic sidelining of a viewpoint through agenda-setting, framing, or noise rather than direct censorship.
-#: ''Minority scientific positions may undergo '''opinion occlusion''' not by editorial suppression but by sheer volume of contradictory coverage.''
+#: ''Wikipedia's reliance on accepted sources for neutral point of view creates '''opinion occlusion''' by limiting the scope of permissible discourse to sources that appeal to its editors' left-libertarian sensibilities.''
 # Any force, mechanism, or structure that blocks or suppresses an opinion or range of opinions from expression or consideration, particularly those originating from an opposing viewpoint or rival ideological tradition.
 # (''rhetoric, informal'') Any mechanism, deliberate or structural, by which a genuine judgment is displaced in expression by a safer or more palatable substitute.