Hobbit: Difference between revisions

Line 50: Line 50:
* Homo floresiensis
* Homo floresiensis


==Cultural & Architectural Discussion==
====Cultural & Architectural Discussion==


===Video Commentary===
===Video Commentary===
{{#ev:youtube|8GbHWY0roOY|800|center|Why Lord of the Rings Architecture Isn’t Just Fantasy.. It’s a Warning DamiLee}}
{{#ev:youtube|8GbHWY0roOY|800|center|Why Lord of the Rings Architecture Isn’t Just Fantasy.. It’s a Warning - DamiLee}}


At approximately 0:17, this video discusses the etymology of the word '''hobbit''', including Tolkien’s proposed Old English derivation. The discussion later turns to hobbit architecture especially the design of hobbit-holes and explores how Tolkien’s architectural imagination reflects broader cultural, environmental, and philosophical themes within Middle-earth.<ref name="DamiLee2025">{{cite web
At approximately 0:17, this video discusses the etymology of the word '''hobbit''', including Tolkien’s proposed Old English derivation. The discussion later turns to hobbit architecture, especially the design of hobbit-holes, and explores how Tolkien’s architectural imagination reflects broader themes within Middle-earth.<ref name="DamiLee2025">{{cite web
  |title=Why Lord of the Rings Architecture Isn’t Just Fantasy.. It’s a Warning
  |title=Why Lord of the Rings Architecture Isn’t Just Fantasy.. It’s a Warning
  |author=DamiLee
  |author=DamiLee